A Cross-national Relationship Between Political Communication and Democracy in the 21st Century
Keywords:
Political Communication, Media Democracy, Comparative Political Communication, Strategic Communication, Press Freedom, Public Service Broadcasting, Digital Media and PoliticsAbstract
Political Communication and Democracy provides a comprehensive and inclusive analysis of political communication, highlighting its divisions through current political events and debates. It concerns the creation, processing, distribution, and impact of information among performers from the public, political system, and media. This paper examines whether Pakistan's democratic standards have been negatively affected by the modernization of political communications, as many people fear. This literary work outlines the elements of the strategic political communication system, also addressing pertinent theories on the interaction of media, cultures, and political elites. Additionally, this paper outlines the cross-national contribution of public service broadcasters for citizens to be informed and enlightened. The current study is based on primary as well as secondary sources. Primary sources are based upon government official records, while secondary sources deal with descriptive and critical analysis of articles, books etc. Accordingly, the findings demonstrate that the concept of democracy has undergone a substantial transformation in the twenty-first century, as the ongoing advancement of technology has greatly facilitated the expansion of political communication.
Downloads
References
Adam, R., McFadyen, S., & Hoskins, C. (2001). Public service broadcasting beyond 2000: Is there a future for public broadcasting? Canadian Journal of Communication, 26(1), 3–15.
Brants, K., & Voltmer, K. (2011). Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics (pp. 1–38). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Curran, J. (2002). Media and power (pp. 135–137). London: Routledge.
Esser, F. (2016). Comparing political communication: An update. Swiss National Science Foundation – NCCR Democracy, 1–36
Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the World 2025: India. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/india
Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the World 2025: Pakistan. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/pakistan.
Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the World 2025: United States. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/country/united-states.
Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (1977). Linkages between the mass media and politics: A model for the analysis of political communication systems. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass communication and society (pp. 271–288). London: Edward Arnold.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics (pp. 10–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective (pp. 89–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jaffrelot, C. (2002). Pakistan: Nationalism without a nation? (pp. 221–223). London: Zed Books.
Larsen, H. (2014). The legitimacy of public service broadcasting in the 21st century: The case of Scandinavia. Nordicom Review, 35(2), 7–65.
Mancini, P. (2012). Comparative media systems: New directions beyond Hallin and Mancini. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(1), 136–137.
McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication (6th ed., pp. 3–15). London: Routledge.
Newton, K. (2016). Public service and commercial broadcasting: Impacts on politics and society. The Political Quarterly, 87(1), 1–8. John Wiley & Sons.
Norris, P. (2010). Political communication for comparative politics (pp. 1–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (2010). Public Sentinel: News media and governance reform (pp. 12–15). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Norris, P. (2014). Encyclopedia of social sciences (pp. 1–22). Harvard University Press.
Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters (pp. 33–36). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reporters Without Borders. (2025). World Press Freedom Index 2025 – India. RSF. https://rsf.org/en/country/india.
Reporters Without Borders. (2025). World Press Freedom Index 2025 – Pakistan. RSF. https://rsf.org/en/country/pakistan.
Reporters Without Borders. (2025). World Press Freedom Index 2025 – United States. RSF. https://rsf.org/en/country/united-states.
Sajjad, M. (n.d.). What is media democracy. Media Democratic Society for Alternative Media and Research, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Ltd., pp. 1–7.
Shami, M. S., & Ashfaq, A. (2018). Political communication in Pakistan: Censorship, digital media, and elite dominance. Journal of Political Studies, 25(1), 101–120.
Shami, M. S., & Ashfaq, A. (2018). Strategic political communication, public relations, reputation management & relationship cultivation through social media. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 55(2), 139–154,
Van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge (pp. 45–47). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Voltmer, K. (2006). The mass media and political communication in new democracies (pp. 5–7, 14–273). London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Umair Ali, Maira Hilal, Saad Zakriya (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
