US Print Media Framing of Nuclear Ambiguity: Israel vs. Iran

Authors

  • Dr. Anjum Zia Associate Professor Department of Mass Communication Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Dr. Sumera Batool Assistant Professor Department of Mass Communication Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Rabia Yousaf Research Associate Department of Mass Communication Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Robina Saeed Chairperson Mass Communication Department Minhaj University, Lahore Author

Abstract

This research work aims at studying the “Nuclear Ambiguity” by evaluating the coverage of Israeli and Iranian nuclear issue in the US print media. The main objective of the study was to examine the news stories and editorial treatment of the above mentioned issue with reference to the foreign policies of the related countries. Content analysis was employed to study the two newspapers; The New York Times and The Washington Post. The data was collected by using census approach and the whole population was considered as sample from the time period of January, 2014 to December, 2015. The theoretical framework of the study comprised of Agenda setting and Framing theory that explain how media can “play up” or “play down” any issue. To determine the significance of the research hypothesis, statistical test chi square was applied and results approved all the hypotheses. The study concluded that US print media followed their national policies and played up the issue of nuclear ambiguity in case of Iran’s nuclear program, while played down the Israel’s nuclear program because Israel is a vital ally of American.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

US Print Media Framing of Nuclear Ambiguity: Israel vs. Iran. (2017). Journal of Politics and International Studies, 3(01), 1-20. https://jpis.pu.edu.pk/45/article/view/16