The Common Assessment Framework for Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan: A Case Study of the Punjab University

Authors

  • Marsha Arshad M.Phil in Public Administration from the Institute of Administrative Sciences, University of the Punjab Lahore, Punjab-Pakistan Author
  • Mahnoor Mansoor PhD Student, Department of Political Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab-Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Assessment Framework, European Institute, Organizations, Quality Management, Self-assessment

Abstract

This research used the common assessment framework (CAF), which the European Institute of Public Administration gives. The selected institute of CAF is the University of Punjab, and it has been designed to be implemented in all departments of the institution to improve its performance. CAF is a framework that provides continuous improvements in organizations. The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) is an instrument of Total Quality Management (TQM), which focuses on quality results in organization performance, customer/citizen, people, and society obtained through leadership driving strategy and planning, people, partnerships & resources, and processes. The primary purpose of this research by ug this CAF was that it is a tool that helps public sector organizations employ total quality management techniques to enhance performance levels. It is a self-assessment model of TQM, mainly executed in public sector organizations to improve their performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

GAŠPARIKOVÁ, P. D. (2013). Implementation and Evaluation of Model CAF in Education Organization. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4 (1).

CAF 2006. (2006). 4th Quality Conference for Public Administration in EU. Finland.

Cafley, J. M. (2015). Leadership in Higher Education: Case Study Research of Canadian University Presidents with Unfinished Mandates. retrived from https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/32385/1/Cafley_Julie_2015_thesis.pdf

Public Sector Leaders: Different Challenges, Different Competencies. (2019). Retrieved 10 October 2019, from https://www.td.org/insights/public-sector-leaders-different-challenges-different-competencies

Oakland, J. (2011). Leadership and policy deployment: The backbone of TQM. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(5), 517-534. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.579407

Lakshman, C. (2006). A theory of leadership for quality: Lessons from TQM for leadership theory1. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 17(1), 41-60. doi: 10.1080/14783360500249729

Waldman, D. (1993). A theoretical consideration of leadership and total quality management. The Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 65-79. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(93)90004-d.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-22

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

How to Cite

The Common Assessment Framework for Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan: A Case Study of the Punjab University. (2025). Journal of Politics and International Studies, 11(1), 180–194. https://jpis.pu.edu.pk/45/article/view/1413

Similar Articles

1-10 of 82

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.