Nexus of Centralization and Disaster Vulnerability in Pakistan: A Study of Devolution Failure and Local Government Disempowerment

Authors

  • Waseem Ashraf PhD Scholar, Center for Public Policy and Governance, Forman Christian College University, Lahore, Punjab-Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Local Governance, Disaster Management, Political Centralization, Pakistan Floods, Bureaucratic Capture, Institutional Fragility

Abstract

Pakistan once again endured the most destructive monsoon season due to high intensity of rain and flash floods. Devastating floods of 2022 and 2025 have exposed serious weaknesses in the governance structure of the country, explicitly the systematic marginalization and disempowerment of local governments. This paper investigates the nexus between political centralization, bureaucratic capture, and inadequate disaster preparedness and response mechanisms. Through a qualitative analysis of policy documents, administrative structures, and disaster management protocols, the study validates that the absence of functional local governance institutions pointedly aggravated flood damage across multiple provinces. The 2022 and 2025 floods caused massive damage to infrastructure, socioeconomic conditions, and lives.  The flood in 2022 swamped almost one-third of Pakistan's land, affected 33 million people in Sindh and Balochistan, and over 6.9 million people across Punjab and Sindh in 2025. These floods disproportionately impacted vulnerable communities due to persistent systemic failures to respond to early warning dissemination, allocating and sharing resources, and response to crisis at local level. This paper explores how the concentration of decision-making authorities at federal and provincial levels, coupled with limited or no financial autonomy of local bodies, has created a governance vacuum that challenges disaster resilience. The study determines that meaningful devolution of powers, strengthening of local governance institutions, and community-centric disaster management frameworks are essential for building resilient systems capable of mitigating risk of imminent natural calamities and adversities. The findings accentuate that effective governance requires institutional empowerment and citizens participation rather than centralized command-and-control mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, D. E. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: New perspectives on natural disasters. Oxford University Press.

Arif, M., & Hameed, N. (2015). Community-based disaster risk management in Pakistan. Disaster Management in South Asia, 42(3), 156–178.

Government of Pakistan. (2023). 2022 floods: National damage and loss assessment. Ministry of Planning, Development and Special Initiatives.

Government of Pakistan. (2023-24). Economic Survey of Pakistan, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad.

Government of Pakistan. (2022). Resilience, Recovery, Rehabilitation, and Reconstruction Framework (4R). Ministry of Planning, Development and Special Initiative, Islamabad.

Monsoon (2025). Daily Situation Report No. 1-80. National Disaster Management Authority, Islamabad.

Government of Pakistan (2025). Post Monsoon Report 2025. National Disaster Management Authority, Islamabad.

Khan, A. (2015). The promise and peril of devolution: Local governance reform in Pakistan. Journal of South Asian Studies, 38(2), 213–232.

Malik, S. (2018). Provincial resistance to devolution: Political economy of local government in Pakistan. South Asian Quarterly, 51(1), 89–107.

Maskrey, A. (2011). Disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: Issues and opportunities in the context of the UNFCCC. IRP and World Bank.

Shaw, R. (Ed.). (2009). Community-based disaster risk reduction. Springer Publications.

Tierney, K. (2012). Disaster governance: Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 341–363.

United Nations Disaster Risk Reduction. (2023). Pakistan 2022 floods: Post-disaster needs assessment. UNDRR Report.

World Bank. (2023). Pakistan 2022 floods: Comprehensive disaster damage and loss assessment. World Bank Pakistan Country Office.

Dixit, S., Peter, S. R., & Arya, S. (2023). A Review on the Role of Nurses in Disaster Management in India. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 14(3), 1644–1647. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2023.14.03.214

Col, J.-M. (2007). Administrative failure in the wake of Katrina. Public Administration Review, 67(S1), 114–124. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00820.x

Drabek, T. E., Hoetmer, G. J., & International City Management Association. (1991). Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government. International City Management Association.

Muhammad Ehsan Leghari. (2025). Not just a disaster, the 2025 floods are a call to reimagine resilience. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/1940947 downloaded on October 15, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-13

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. 

How to Cite

Nexus of Centralization and Disaster Vulnerability in Pakistan: A Study of Devolution Failure and Local Government Disempowerment. (2025). Journal of Politics and International Studies, 11(2), 22-33. https://jpis.pu.edu.pk/45/article/view/1420

Similar Articles

21-30 of 200

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.